spring aop底层原理及如何实现

目录前言使用源码分析总结

前言

相信每天工作都要用spring框架的大家一定使用过spring aop,aop的概念是面向切面编程,相对与传统的面向对象编程oop,aop更关注的是横向的逻辑,比如说一个大型系统中的日志记录,异常处理,性能监控等等,都是各个模块都需要的操作,那样代表着这些操作会散落在系统的各个地方,不易管理且杂乱无章,而aop就是关注的这些,aop将这些操作与业务代码分离,统一成一个个的切面,针对这些个切面进行编程处理。spring aop使得我们的aop开发工作变得简单,这次我就给大家讲讲spring aop的底层原理和实现

使用

要分析spring aop的底层原理,首先要会使用,先创建一个普通maven webapp项目,引入spring-context依赖,版本为5.1.1RELEASE

<dependency>      <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>      <artifactId>spring-context</artifactId>      <version>5.1.1.RELEASE</version>    </dependency>

然后我使用aspectj作为aop的语法实现,和spring整合起来

<dependency>      <groupId>org.aspectj</groupId>      <artifactId>aspectjweaver</artifactId>      <version>1.9.4</version>    </dependency>

接下来我全称用注解的形式来模拟spring aop的使用,先创建一个配置类去扫描包,开启aspectJ的自动代理支持

@Configuration@EnableAspectJAutoProxy@ComponentScan("com.ww")public class Wconfig {}

然后新建一个接口和接口的实现类

public interface Dao {    void query();}@Componentpublic class IndexDao implements Dao{    @Override    public void query() {        System.out.println("query......");    }}

创建切面

//代表是一个切面@Aspect@Componentpublic class WAspect {    /**     * execution表达式,可以百度写法     */    @Pointcut("execution(* com.ww.dao.*.*(..))")    public void point(){    }    /**     * 在切点上进行前置通知     */    @Before("point()")    public void beforeAd(){        System.out.println("before-------------");    }}

创建测试方法

public class TestAspect {    public static void main(String[] args) {        AnnotationConfigApplicationContext configApplicationContext = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(Wconfig.class);        Dao dao = configApplicationContext.getBean(Dao.class);        dao.query();    }}

执行方法,可以看到在打印query…之前打印了before———-

这个时候我们很想知道为什么这句before会打印在query之前呢,稍微对spring aop有所了解的人应该知道,spring是通过动态代理和字节码技术来实现aop操作的,也就是经常说的jdk动态代理和cglib动态代理两种模式,那么,spring究竟是怎么创建的代理对象,又是什么时候产生的代理对象呢,下面我们来一起探究一下源码,来揭开这个谜底

源码分析

首先我们透过现象看本质,我先把断点打在测试方法的最后一行,我们来看这个时候的dao对象

那么接下来我们就要去找到什么时候这个dao对象变成了动态代理对象的,既然在最后一行的时候对象已经变成了代理对象,那么我门自然就猜想是在上一句代码的位置spring执行了创建代理对象的操作,我们把断点移到上一行,debug进去

再往下走

这行代码我看方法名觉得应该是有用的代码,方法意思应该是spring处理好的bean,跟进去看看

@Nullableprivate <T> T resolveBean(ResolvableType requiredType, @Nullable Object[] args, boolean nonUniqueAsNull) {        //这行代码最有用,处理有beanName的bean,debug进入看一下NamedBeanHolder<T> namedBean = resolveNamedBean(requiredType, args, nonUniqueAsNull);if (namedBean != null) {return namedBean.getBeanInstance();}BeanFactory parent = getParentBeanFactory();if (parent instanceof DefaultListableBeanFactory) {return ((DefaultListableBeanFactory) parent).resolveBean(requiredType, args, nonUniqueAsNull);}else if (parent != null) {ObjectProvider<T> parentProvider = parent.getBeanProvider(requiredType);if (args != null) {return parentProvider.getObject(args);}else {return (nonUniqueAsNull ? parentProvider.getIfUnique() : parentProvider.getIfAvailable());}}return null;}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")@Nullableprivate <T> NamedBeanHolder<T> resolveNamedBean(ResolvableType requiredType, @Nullable Object[] args, boolean nonUniqueAsNull) throws BeansException {Assert.notNull(requiredType, "Required type must not be null");Class<?> clazz = requiredType.getRawClass();Assert.notNull(clazz, "Required type must have a raw Class");        //候选name列表,直觉告诉我这行代码比较重要String[] candidateNames = getBeanNamesForType(requiredType);if (candidateNames.length > 1) {List<String> autowireCandidates = new ArrayList<>(candidateNames.length);for (String beanName : candidateNames) {if (!containsBeanDefinition(beanName) || getBeanDefinition(beanName).isAutowireCandidate()) {autowireCandidates.add(beanName);}}if (!autowireCandidates.isEmpty()) {candidateNames = StringUtils.toStringArray(autowireCandidates);}}        //因为我的代码里只有一个bean,所以我觉得应该会执行这里的代码if (candidateNames.length == 1) {String beanName = candidateNames[0];return new NamedBeanHolder<>(beanName, (T) getBean(beanName, clazz, args));}else if (candidateNames.length > 1) {Map<String, Object> candidates = new LinkedHashMap<>(candidateNames.length);for (String beanName : candidateNames) {if (containsSingleton(beanName) && args == null) {Object beanInstance = getBean(beanName);candidates.put(beanName, (beanInstance instanceof NullBean ? null : beanInstance));}else {candidates.put(beanName, getType(beanName));}}String candidateName = determinePrimaryCandidate(candidates, clazz);if (candidateName == null) {candidateName = determineHighestPriorityCandidate(candidates, clazz);}if (candidateName != null) {Object beanInstance = candidates.get(candidateName);if (beanInstance == null || beanInstance instanceof Class) {beanInstance = getBean(candidateName, clazz, args);}return new NamedBeanHolder<>(candidateName, (T) beanInstance);}if (!nonUniqueAsNull) {throw new NoUniqueBeanDefinitionException(requiredType, candidates.keySet());}}return null;}

执行完getBeanNamesForType(requiredType)后,我们看idea的变量显示,果然有一个bean,name是IndexDao

那么接下来自然会进到length==1的那个代码块,这时候我再debug进入,这里还是一个getBean方法

在spring容器中还有一些没有name的其他的bean需要被创建,所以这里我用上了条件断点,当beanName等于indexDao的时候,才会进入断点,但是当我F8跑完这行代码的时候,出乎意料的事情发生了

惊不惊喜,意不意外,getSingleton这行代码执行结束之后,代理对象就已经被创建了,所以需要debug进入这行代码去看

protected Object getSingleton(String beanName, boolean allowEarlyReference) {        //spring所有的bean被放在ioc容器中的地方,就是这个singletonObjects,这是一个concorrentHashMap。Object singletonObject = this.singletonObjects.get(beanName);if (singletonObject == null && isSingletonCurrentlyInCreation(beanName)) {synchronized (this.singletonObjects) {singletonObject = this.earlySingletonObjects.get(beanName);if (singletonObject == null && allowEarlyReference) {ObjectFactory<?> singletonFactory = this.singletonFactories.get(beanName);if (singletonFactory != null) {singletonObject = singletonFactory.getObject();this.earlySingletonObjects.put(beanName, singletonObject);this.singletonFactories.remove(beanName);}}}}return singletonObject;}

但是我在这里只看到了get方法,那么这些bean是什么时候放到singletonObjects里的呢,我来找找

protected void addSingleton(String beanName, Object singletonObject) {synchronized (this.singletonObjects) {this.singletonObjects.put(beanName, singletonObject);this.singletonFactories.remove(beanName);this.earlySingletonObjects.remove(beanName);this.registeredSingletons.add(beanName);}}

在DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry注册器中,我找到了singletonObjects.put方法,代表bean是这个时候被放到这个map里去的,接下来我在这行代码上进行条件断点,然后我们来看它的调用链,找出是什么时候执行的addSingleton方法,其实从这个时候我已经知道,断点打在测试方法的倒数第二行是不对的,在getBean之前其实代理对象已经产生了

// Create bean instance.if (mbd.isSingleton()) {sharedInstance = getSingleton(beanName, () -> {try {                            //创建bean,核心代码return createBean(beanName, mbd, args);}catch (BeansException ex) {// Explicitly remove instance from singleton cache: It might have been put there// eagerly by the creation process, to allow for circular reference resolution.// Also remove any beans that received a temporary reference to the bean.destroySingleton(beanName);throw ex;}});bean = getObjectForBeanInstance(sharedInstance, name, beanName, mbd);}

在createBean方法上,我也加上条件断点,然后debug进入

@Overrideprotected Object createBean(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd, @Nullable Object[] args)throws BeanCreationException {if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {logger.trace("Creating instance of bean '" + beanName + "'");}RootBeanDefinition mbdToUse = mbd;// Make sure bean class is actually resolved at this point, and// clone the bean definition in case of a dynamically resolved Class// which cannot be stored in the shared merged bean definition.Class<?> resolvedClass = resolveBeanClass(mbd, beanName);if (resolvedClass != null && !mbd.hasBeanClass() && mbd.getBeanClassName() != null) {mbdToUse = new RootBeanDefinition(mbd);mbdToUse.setBeanClass(resolvedClass);}// Prepare method overrides.try {mbdToUse.prepareMethodOverrides();}catch (BeanDefinitionValidationException ex) {throw new BeanDefinitionStoreException(mbdToUse.getResourceDescription(),beanName, "Validation of method overrides failed", ex);}try {// Give BeanPostProcessors a chance to return a proxy instead of the target bean instance.Object bean = resolveBeforeInstantiation(beanName, mbdToUse);if (bean != null) {return bean;}}catch (Throwable ex) {throw new BeanCreationException(mbdToUse.getResourceDescription(), beanName,"BeanPostProcessor before instantiation of bean failed", ex);}try {            //核心代码,创建bean实例,需要断点进入Object beanInstance = doCreateBean(beanName, mbdToUse, args);if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {logger.trace("Finished creating instance of bean '" + beanName + "'");}return beanInstance;}catch (BeanCreationException | ImplicitlyAppearedSingletonException ex) {// A previously detected exception with proper bean creation context already,// or illegal singleton state to be communicated up to DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.throw ex;}catch (Throwable ex) {throw new BeanCreationException(mbdToUse.getResourceDescription(), beanName, "Unexpected exception during bean creation", ex);}}

接下来我debug进入doCreateBean方法

debug跟进initializeBean方法,条件断点在两个初始化处理器上,我隐约觉得代理对象就是从这两个方法中产生的,我们拭目以待

protected Object initializeBean(final String beanName, final Object bean, @Nullable RootBeanDefinition mbd) {if (System.getSecurityManager() != null) {AccessController.doPrivileged((PrivilegedAction<Object>) () -> {invokeAwareMethods(beanName, bean);return null;}, getAccessControlContext());}else {invokeAwareMethods(beanName, bean);}        //包装的beanObject wrappedBean = bean;if (mbd == null || !mbd.isSynthetic()) {            //执行前置初始化beanPostProcessor处理器wrappedBean = applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInitialization(wrappedBean, beanName);}try {invokeInitMethods(beanName, wrappedBean, mbd);}catch (Throwable ex) {throw new BeanCreationException((mbd != null ? mbd.getResourceDescription() : null),beanName, "Invocation of init method failed", ex);}if (mbd == null || !mbd.isSynthetic()) {            //执行初始化后的beanPostProcessor处理器wrappedBean = applyBeanPostProcessorsAfterInitialization(wrappedBean, beanName);}return wrappedBean;}

执行完applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInitialization方法,这个时候我们看到warppedBean还是indexDao,并没有产生代理对象

我猜想在下一个后置处理器中,代理对象将被创建,我debug进去

public Object applyBeanPostProcessorsAfterInitialization(Object existingBean, String beanName)throws BeansException {Object result = existingBean;for (BeanPostProcessor processor : getBeanPostProcessors()) {            //经过处理器处理后的bean,我先看看有多少个处理器Object current = processor.postProcessAfterInitialization(result, beanName);if (current == null) {return result;}result = current;}return result;}

可以看到我的猜想被证明是正确的,运行完这个后置处理器,代理对象就被创建出来了。 到了这里我们知道了代理对象是从哪里来的了,但是还是没搞清楚代理对象是怎么创建出来的,这时候我们就需要debug进入到这个处理器内部去瞧瞧了。

@Overridepublic Object postProcessAfterInitialization(@Nullable Object bean, String beanName) {if (bean != null) {            //获取缓存key,不重要Object cacheKey = getCacheKey(bean.getClass(), beanName);if (!this.earlyProxyReferences.contains(cacheKey)) {                //重要方法,需要debug进去看return wrapIfNecessary(bean, beanName, cacheKey);}}return bean;}

于是乎我又进到了wrapIfNecessary这个方法内部

protected Object wrapIfNecessary(Object bean, String beanName, Object cacheKey) {if (StringUtils.hasLength(beanName) && this.targetSourcedBeans.contains(beanName)) {return bean;}if (Boolean.FALSE.equals(this.advisedBeans.get(cacheKey))) {return bean;}if (isInfrastructureClass(bean.getClass()) || shouldSkip(bean.getClass(), beanName)) {this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.FALSE);return bean;}// Create proxy if we have advice.        //看到上面这行注释,可以确定代理类就是从这里产生的,下面这个方法得到的都是一些包括切点信息,通知类型等等的信息Object[] specificInterceptors = getAdvicesAndAdvisorsForBean(bean.getClass(), beanName, null);if (specificInterceptors != DO_NOT_PROXY) {this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.TRUE);            //顾名思义,创建代理,bebug进入看看Object proxy = createProxy(bean.getClass(), beanName, specificInterceptors, new SingletonTargetSource(bean));this.proxyTypes.put(cacheKey, proxy.getClass());return proxy;}this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.FALSE);return bean;}
protected Object createProxy(Class<?> beanClass, @Nullable String beanName,@Nullable Object[] specificInterceptors, TargetSource targetSource) {if (this.beanFactory instanceof ConfigurableListableBeanFactory) {AutoProxyUtils.exposeTargetClass((ConfigurableListableBeanFactory) this.beanFactory, beanName, beanClass);}ProxyFactory proxyFactory = new ProxyFactory();proxyFactory.copyFrom(this);if (!proxyFactory.isProxyTargetClass()) {if (shouldProxyTargetClass(beanClass, beanName)) {proxyFactory.setProxyTargetClass(true);}else {evaluateProxyInterfaces(beanClass, proxyFactory);}}Advisor[] advisors = buildAdvisors(beanName, specificInterceptors);proxyFactory.addAdvisors(advisors);proxyFactory.setTargetSource(targetSource);customizeProxyFactory(proxyFactory);proxyFactory.setFrozen(this.freezeProxy);if (advisorsPreFiltered()) {proxyFactory.setPreFiltered(true);}        //重要的地方在这里,代理对象是通过这个方法生成的return proxyFactory.getProxy(getProxyClassLoader());}    public Object getProxy(@Nullable ClassLoader classLoader) {        //debug进去看看return createAopProxy().getProxy(classLoader);}
protected final synchronized AopProxy createAopProxy() {if (!this.active) {activate();}        //同样需要debug进入看看return getAopProxyFactory().createAopProxy(this);}

我们看到这里有一个if语句,当config中的isOptimize和isProxyTargetClass还有hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces三个判断条件只要有一个满足的话,spring就会选择cglib的方式进行动态代理,而config中的两个boolean变量的默认值都是false,而我们的被代理对象又是实现接口的,所以spring会选择jdk动态代理的实现形式来完成动态代理,当然,我们也可以在这种情况下手动的配置config值来让spring选择cglib作为动态代理的实现方式,稍后我会演示

@Overridepublic AopProxy createAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException {if (config.isOptimize() || config.isProxyTargetClass() || hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces(config)) {Class<?> targetClass = config.getTargetClass();if (targetClass == null) {throw new AopConfigException("TargetSource cannot determine target class: " +"Either an interface or a target is required for proxy creation.");}if (targetClass.isInterface() || Proxy.isProxyClass(targetClass)) {return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);}return new ObjenesisCglibAopProxy(config);}else {            //现在知道为什么我们的代理类是动态代理了吗return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);}}

总结

我以spring aop实现的调用链图来结束这次的总结

以上就是spring aop底层原理及如何实现的详细内容,更多关于spring aop原理及实现的资料请关注其它相关文章!

用敬业的精神去面对每一份挑战,

spring aop底层原理及如何实现

相关文章:

你感兴趣的文章:

标签云: